Coriolis Forces
A derivation for coriolis forces can be found be found on the wikipedia page for fictitious forces.
In general for an accelerating reference frame in rectangular coordinates the factious forces are given by:
Where:
he first term is the Coriolis force, the second term is the centrifugal force, and the third term is the Euler force. When the rate of rotation doesn’t change, as is typically the case for a planet, the Euler force is zero.
Looking specifically at the Coriolis force:
which gives in (eastwest,northsourth, height) coordinates:
Where is the latitudinal coordinate (equator=zero latitude).
In general the cross product for a coordinate with orthonormal direction vectors is given by:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coriolis_effect#Formula
since the basis direction vectors are orthogonal in hopkins and simmons coordinates write write:
(note with regards to weather the system is right handed we can choose the direction of the logitudanal cordinate to make it right handed.)
Just to recall from the post (Hoskins and Simmons (1974) Coordinate System):
where theta is the latitude.
Where is the surface pressure and is the vertical coordinate.
is the longitude.
Additionally:
U is the longitudinal component of the velocity
V is the latitudinal component of the velocity
W is the vertical component of the veolicty (not used in Hopkins and Simmons 1974)
Now the angular velocity of the earth in Hopkins and Simmons is given by:
Where the sign of is positive for the northern hemisphere and negative for the southern hemisphere.
Therefore:
Some comments:
The result obtained is essentialy the same result that one would get if, they took the(east west,north south, altitude) coordinate system and replaced with .
The only differences are the order and sign of the components. These are the only differences because both coordinate contain the same unit vectors. In my example of a Hopkins and Simon’s like coordinate system I used a different order for the components then was used in my example for the (eastwest, north south altitude) coordinate system. This will effect the sign in the cross product.
I wrote the z component of the angular velocity as to emphasize that the positive direction for the z component in Simpons coordinate system is downward. However, the actual angular rotation of the earth in simons coordinate system still have a postive component depending on the which direction is defined as positive for the longitudinal coordinate.
The order which we specify the coordinates determines the right handedness of the coordinate system. Therefore, righthandedness is not inherently a geometric property because it depends on the order of the coordinates. For instance, in standard Cartesian coordinates
In our case the first coordinat,e , was specified in the downward direction, our second coordinate, , points south, now using the right hand rule means that gives the positive direction for the third coordinate in the east direction.
It is for these reasons that differences can arrise, and therefore it is very important when doing cross products to clearly express the postive direction of the coordinate unit vectors and the order of the coordinates.
2 Comments »
Leave a Reply

Recent
 Laplace Transform Via Limits
 log(CO2) and Scary Graphs
 Numeric Solutions to The Heat Equation
 Coriolis Forces in Hopkins and Simmons Vorticity Equation
 The Cross Product in Non Orthogonal Coordinate Systems
 Lagrangian Mechanics and The Heat Equation
 Laplace Transform of f(t) Related to smoothed f(t)?
 Coriolis Forces
 Vector Operations in Hoskins and Simmons Coordinates
 API/Object Viewers/Memory Mapping/
 Defining a Microsoft access Datasource
 Fractal Modeling of Turbulence

Links

Archives
 July 2012 (1)
 September 2009 (5)
 August 2009 (19)
 March 2009 (2)

Categories

RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
[…] in Non Orthogonal Coordinate Systems The form of the cross product I’ve shown in my post Coriolis Forces […]
Pingback by The Cross Product in Non Orthogonal Coordinate Systems « Earth Cubed  September 8, 2009 
[…] my post Coriolis forces in Hopkins and Simmons I compute the coriolis force […]
Pingback by Coriolis Forces in Hopkins and Simmons Vorticity Equation « Earth Cubed  September 12, 2009 